Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Yazbeck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Needs major cleanup, lots of coverage (non-admin closure) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Yazbeck

Non Notable. One reference only listing performances. Cargoking talk 11:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wheres the secondary sources?, Is there anything that says why he is notable? I see nothing really that satisfyes WP:ENT, no large fan base, no unique contributions, and i dont understand if his roles are significant considering hes labeled as an understudy. Bottom line it needs sources erifiying this Ottawa4ever (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Broadway star. Per [1], [2], [3], [4]. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Loads of coverage in reliable sources found by Google News. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per the !votes above. Iowateen (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BEFORE. Send to WP:CLEANUP per available sources [5], [6]]. Yes, the article currently needs work... but that is (with respects) is not a reason for deletion. Tag it for help and move on. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.